6.5 KiB
Testing Patterns
Analysis Date: 2026-03-13
Test Infrastructure
Status: NO TESTING INFRASTRUCTURE DETECTED
The codebase currently lacks automated testing configuration and test files.
Test Framework
Runner: Not configured
- No Jest configuration detected
- No Vitest configuration detected
- No Playwright/Cypress configuration detected
Assertion Library: Not configured
- No testing libraries in dependencies
Run Commands: Not available
package.jsononly defines:"build": "vite build"- No test scripts present
Test File Organization
Current State:
- No test files in source code (
*.test.ts,*.spec.ts,*.test.tsx,*.spec.tsx) - All test file matches were from
node_modules/(zod library tests)
File Pattern: Not established
Test Directory Structure: Not implemented
Code Quality Indicators
TODO/FIXME Comments
Minimal technical debt markers found:
MobileSettingView.tsxline 31:placeholder="+63 XXX XXX XXXX"(placeholder text, not TODO)
Code Complexity
View component line counts (reasonable for view components):
FlashMemoryView.tsx 112 lines
ADCSettingView.tsx 83 lines
LevelSettingView.tsx 78 lines
MobileSettingView.tsx 70 lines
RainfallSettingView.tsx 69 lines
NetworkSetupView.tsx 69 lines
DateTimeSettingView.tsx 65 lines
CalibrationView.tsx 63 lines
RainfallView.tsx 63 lines
SettingView.tsx 76 lines
LoginView.tsx 61 lines
GraphView.tsx 51 lines
EVAPSettingView.tsx 54 lines
SirenSettingView.tsx 71 lines
GPRSSettingView.tsx 68 lines
StationInfoView.tsx 40 lines
Total view code: ~1,092 lines across 16 view files
Component Complexity
UI components (src/app/components/ui/):
- Range: 6 lines (
utils.ts) to 168 lines (form.tsx) - Most components: 20-90 lines
- Pattern: Small, focused components following shadcn/ui conventions
Missing Testing Infrastructure
Critical Gaps
- No unit test framework - Components cannot be unit tested
- No integration tests - Route integration untested
- No E2E tests - User flows untested
- No test scripts - No CI/CD integration possible
- No mocking strategy - External dependencies not mockable
Testing Dependencies to Add
For comprehensive testing, the following would be needed:
{
"devDependencies": {
"vitest": "^2.x",
"@testing-library/react": "^14.x",
"@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.x",
"@testing-library/user-event": "^14.x",
"jsdom": "^24.x"
}
}
Or alternatively with Jest:
{
"devDependencies": {
"jest": "^29.x",
"@testing-library/react": "^14.x",
"@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.x",
"ts-jest": "^29.x",
"jest-environment-jsdom": "^29.x"
}
}
Recommended Testing Strategy
Priority 1: Unit Tests for UI Components
Test critical UI primitives in src/app/components/ui/:
button.tsx- Variant rendering, click handlingcard.tsx- Composition patterninput.tsx- Value handling, focus statesswitch.tsx- Toggle behavior
Priority 2: View Component Tests
Test user interactions in views:
- Form submissions
- State changes
- Navigation triggers
Priority 3: Integration Tests
Test route configuration:
- Route rendering
- Navigation flow
- Layout composition
Testing Conventions to Establish
Test File Naming
Recommended pattern (when tests are added):
- Co-located:
[Component].test.tsxnext to[Component].tsx - Or separate:
__tests__/[Component].test.tsx
Test Structure (Recommended)
// button.test.tsx - Example pattern to follow
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import { Button } from './button';
describe('Button', () => {
it('renders with default variant', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>);
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('handles click events', () => {
const handleClick = vi.fn();
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click me</Button>);
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Click me'));
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it('renders different variants', () => {
const { rerender } = render(<Button variant="destructive">Delete</Button>);
// Assert destructive styling
rerender(<Button variant="outline">Cancel</Button>);
// Assert outline styling
});
});
Mocking Strategy (Recommended)
External Libraries:
- Mock
lucide-reacticons for snapshot stability - Mock
@radix-uicomponents at boundary
Browser APIs:
- Mock
document.getElementById()for scroll tests - Mock
windowevents if needed
Example Mock Pattern:
// Mock scroll behavior
const scrollByMock = vi.fn();
Object.defineProperty(document, 'getElementById', {
value: vi.fn(() => ({ scrollBy: scrollByMock })),
});
Coverage Recommendations
Minimum Targets
- UI Components: 80% coverage (small, critical components)
- View Components: 60% coverage (user interaction paths)
- Utility Functions: 90% coverage (business logic)
- Routes: Integration tests for all paths
Critical Paths to Test
- Login form submission
- Sidebar navigation
- File selection in FlashMemoryView
- Settings toggle switches
- Navigation button scrolling
CI/CD Integration
GitHub Actions (Recommended)
When tests are added, include in workflow:
name: Test
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
- run: pnpm install
- run: pnpm test
- run: pnpm test:coverage
Testing Documentation Gap
Issue: No testing guidelines in existing documentation
The Guidelines.md file (458 lines) covers:
- Design patterns
- Color palettes
- Component naming
- Touchscreen guidelines
But does NOT cover:
- Testing conventions
- Test file organization
- Mocking patterns
- Coverage requirements
Action Items for Testing
- Add testing dependencies (Vitest + React Testing Library recommended)
- Create
vitest.config.tswith jsdom environment - Add test scripts to
package.json - Write initial tests for critical UI components
- Document testing patterns in Guidelines.md
- Set up CI/CD to run tests on PR
- Establish coverage thresholds
Testing analysis: 2026-03-13
Summary: This codebase currently has no testing infrastructure. All testing patterns documented above are recommendations for implementation rather than observed conventions.