4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
Continuation Format
Standard format for presenting next steps after completing a command or workflow.
Core Structure
---
## ▶ Next Up
**{identifier}: {name}** — {one-line description}
`{command to copy-paste}`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
**Also available:**
- `{alternative option 1}` — description
- `{alternative option 2}` — description
---
Format Rules
- Always show what it is — name + description, never just a command path
- Pull context from source — ROADMAP.md for phases, PLAN.md
<objective>for plans - Command in inline code — backticks, easy to copy-paste, renders as clickable link
/newexplanation — always include, keeps it concise but explains why- "Also available" not "Other options" — sounds more app-like
- Visual separators —
---above and below to make it stand out
Variants
Execute Next Plan
---
## ▶ Next Up
**02-03: Refresh Token Rotation** — Add /api/auth/refresh with sliding expiry
`/gsd-execute-phase 2`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
**Also available:**
- Review plan before executing
- `/gsd-list-phase-assumptions 2` — check assumptions
---
Execute Final Plan in Phase
Add note that this is the last plan and what comes after:
---
## ▶ Next Up
**02-03: Refresh Token Rotation** — Add /api/auth/refresh with sliding expiry
*Final plan in Phase 2*
`/gsd-execute-phase 2`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
**After this completes:**
- Phase 2 → Phase 3 transition
- Next: **Phase 3: Core Features** — User dashboard and settings
---
Plan a Phase
---
## ▶ Next Up
**Phase 2: Authentication** — JWT login flow with refresh tokens
`/gsd-plan-phase 2`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-discuss-phase 2` — gather context first
- `/gsd-research-phase 2` — investigate unknowns
- Review roadmap
---
Phase Complete, Ready for Next
Show completion status before next action:
---
## ✓ Phase 2 Complete
3/3 plans executed
## ▶ Next Up
**Phase 3: Core Features** — User dashboard, settings, and data export
`/gsd-plan-phase 3`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-discuss-phase 3` — gather context first
- `/gsd-research-phase 3` — investigate unknowns
- Review what Phase 2 built
---
Multiple Equal Options
When there's no clear primary action:
---
## ▶ Next Up
**Phase 3: Core Features** — User dashboard, settings, and data export
**To plan directly:** `/gsd-plan-phase 3`
**To discuss context first:** `/gsd-discuss-phase 3`
**To research unknowns:** `/gsd-research-phase 3`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
Milestone Complete
---
## 🎉 Milestone v1.0 Complete
All 4 phases shipped
## ▶ Next Up
**Start v1.1** — questioning → research → requirements → roadmap
`/gsd-new-milestone`
*`/new` first → fresh context window*
---
Pulling Context
For phases (from ROADMAP.md):
### Phase 2: Authentication
**Goal**: JWT login flow with refresh tokens
Extract: **Phase 2: Authentication** — JWT login flow with refresh tokens
For plans (from ROADMAP.md):
Plans:
- [ ] 02-03: Add refresh token rotation
Or from PLAN.md <objective>:
<objective>
Add refresh token rotation with sliding expiry window.
Purpose: Extend session lifetime without compromising security.
</objective>
Extract: **02-03: Refresh Token Rotation** — Add /api/auth/refresh with sliding expiry
Anti-Patterns
Don't: Command-only (no context)
## To Continue
Run `/new`, then paste:
/gsd-execute-phase 2
User has no idea what 02-03 is about.
Don't: Missing /new explanation
`/gsd-plan-phase 3`
Run /new first.
Doesn't explain why. User might skip it.
Don't: "Other options" language
Other options:
- Review roadmap
Sounds like an afterthought. Use "Also available:" instead.
Don't: Fenced code blocks for commands
/gsd-plan-phase 3
Fenced blocks inside templates create nesting ambiguity. Use inline backticks instead.